Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±¸¸® ÇÕ±Ý ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ ½ºÄÉÀÏ·¯ ÆÁÀÌ Ä¡°ú ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¹× ¼öº¹ Àç·á Ç¥¸é¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

The effect of copper alloy scaler tip on the surface roughness of dental implant and restorative materials

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 52±Ç 3È£ p.177 ~ 185
À̾Ƹ§, Á¤Á¤ÈÆ, Á¤°Ü¿î, ¹æÀº°æ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À̾Ƹ§ ( Lee Ah-Reum ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÓ»óÄ¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Àӻ󱸰­º¸°ÇÇаú
Á¤Á¤ÈÆ ( Chung Chung-Hoon ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ºÎ¼Ó¸ñµ¿º´¿ø Ä¡ÁÖ°ú
Á¤°Ü¿î ( Jung Gyu-Un ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÓ»óÄ¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Àӻ󱸰­º¸°ÇÇаú
¹æÀº°æ ( Pang Eun-Kyoung ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÓ»óÄ¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Àӻ󱸰­º¸°ÇÇаú

Abstract

¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸´Â ±¸¸® ÇÕ±Ý ½ºÄÉÀÏ·¯ ÆÁÀ» ºñ·ÔÇÑ ¼öÁ¾ÀÇ ½ºÄÉÀÏ·¯ ÆÁÀÌ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿Í ¼öº¹¹° Àç·á Ç¥¸é¿¡ ½ÇÁ¦ Ä¡¼®Á¦°Å ½Ã¿Í °°ÀÌ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ Ç¥¸é °ÅÄ¥±â¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý:µµÀç, ƼŸ´½, Áö¸£ÄڴϾÆ, Á¦3Çü ±ÝÇÕ±ÝÀÇ Áö¸§ 15 mm, ³ôÀÌ 1.5 mmÀÇ ¿ø¹ÝÇü ½ÃÆíÀ» ÁغñÇÏ¿´°í, °ÅÄ¥±â Çü¼º±â±¸·Î ½ºÅ×Àθ®½º ½ºÆ¿ÆÁ(SS), Çöó½ºÆ½ ¼öµ¿ Å¥·¿(PS), ±¸¸® ÇÕ±Ý ÆÁ(IS)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ½ÃÆíÀÇ °³¼ö´Â °¢ Àç·á ´ç ±â±¸ º°·Î 4°³¾¿ ÃÑ 64°³¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. Ç¥¸é °ÅÄ¥±â´Â 40 gÀÇ ÈûÀ¸·Î ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ ½ºÄÉÀÏ·¯´Â ½ÃÆíÀÇ Ç¥¸é°ú ÆÁÀÌ 15µµ, ÇÚµå Å¥·¿Àº ½ÃÆíÀÇ Ç¥¸é°ú Å¥·¿ÀÇ ³¯ÀÌ 45µµ°¡ µÇµµ·Ï ÇÏ¿© 1ÃÊ¿¡ 1ȸ 5 mm ¼öÆò ¿Õº¹ ¿îµ¿À» 30ÃÊ µ¿¾È ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© Çü¼ºÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ ½ÃÆíÀ» ÁÖ»çÀüÀÚ Çö¹Ì°æÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °üÂûÇÏ¿´°í, ¿øÀÚÇö¹Ì°æ°ú Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµ °ÅÄ¥±â ´Ü Â÷ ÃøÁ¤±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Ç¥¸é °ÅÄ¥±â(Ra, §­)¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ°í ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú:ÁÖ»çÀüÀÚ Çö¹Ì°æÀ¸·Î °üÂû °á°ú Ç¥¸é °ÅÄ¥±âÀÇ Áõ°¡´Â ½ºÅ×Àθ®½º ½ºÆ¿ ÆÁ(Group SS)¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ÄÇÀ¸¸ç ±¸¸® ÇÕ±Ý ÆÁ(Group IS)¿¡¼­ °¡Àå Àû°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¿øÀÚÇö¹Ì°æÀ¸·Î Ç¥¸é °ÅÄ¥±â¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú, ½ºÅ×Àθ®½º ½ºÆ¿ ÆÁ(Group SS)Àº µµÀç ±º°ú Á¦3Çü ±ÝÇÕ±Ý ±º¿¡¼­ ´ëÁ¶±º°ú Çöó½ºÆ½ ¼öµ¿ Å¥·¿(Group PS), ±¸¸® ÇÕ±Ý ÆÁ(Group IS)º¸´Ù Ç¥¸é °ÅÄ¥±â°¡ À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ°Ô Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, ±¸¸® ÇÕ±Ý ÆÁ(Group IS)Àº ±ÝÇÕ±Ý ±º¿¡¼­´Â ½ºÅ×Àθ®½º ½ºÆ¿ ÆÁ(Group SS)°ú Çöó½ºÆ½ ¼öµ¿ Å¥·¿(Group PS)¿¡ ºñÇØ Ç¥¸é °ÅÄ¥±â°¡ À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ°Ô Àû°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµ °ÅÄ¥±â ´Ü Â÷ ÃøÁ¤±â·Î ÃøÁ¤ °á°ú, ½ºÅ×Àθ®½º ½ºÆ¿ ÆÁ(Group SS)Àº ¸ðµç ±º¿¡¼­ ´ëÁ¶±º ¹× Çöó½ºÆ½ ¼öµ¿ Å¥·¿(Group PS)°ú ±¸¸® ÇÕ±Ý ÆÁ(Group IS)º¸´Ù Ç¥¸é °ÅÄ¥±â°¡ À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ°Ô Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ±¸¸® ÇÕ±Ý ÆÁ(Group IS)Àº ¸ðµç ±º¿¡¼­ ½ºÅ×Àθ®½º ½ºÆ¿ ÆÁ(Group SS)¿¡ ºñÇØ Ç¥¸é °ÅÄ¥±â°¡ À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ°Ô Àû°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Á¦3Çü ±ÝÇÕ±ÝÀº µµÀç, ƼŸ´½, Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ ±º¿¡ ºñÇØ Ä¡¼®Á¦°Å ±â±¸¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Ç¥¸é °ÅÄ¥±âÀÇ Áõ°¡°¡ Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù(P<.05).

°á·Ð:ÀÌ»óÀÇ ¿¬±¸°á°ú »õ·ÎÀÌ °³¹ßµÈ ±¸¸® ÇÕ±Ý ÆÁ(IS)À» Àû¿ëÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ ƼŸ´½ ¹× Ä¡°ú ¼öº¹ Àç·áÀÇ Ç¥¸é °ÅÄ¥±â¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖÁö ¾ÊÀ½À¸·Î½á, ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¹× ¼öº¹Ä¡·á µÈ Ä¡¾ÆÀÇ Ä¡¼®Á¦°Å ½Ã ÀüÅëÀûÀÎ ½ºÅ×Àθ®½º ½ºÆ¿ ÆÁ(SS)ÀÇ ´ë¿ëÇ°À¸·Î À¯¿ëÇÏ°Ô »ç¿ëµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.

PURPOSE. This study is designed to investigate the various impacts of different types of scaler tips such as cooper alloy base tip and the others on the surface roughness of teeth and implant by the method which is currently in clinical use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four different types of disc shaped porcelain, titanium, zirconia, and Type III gold alloy dental materials sized 15 mm diameter, 1.5 mm thickness were used for the experiment. Plastic hand curette (Group PS), cooper alloy new tip (Group IS), and stainless steel tip (Group SS) were used as testing appliances. A total of 64 specimens were used for this study; Four specimens for each material and appliance group. Surface roughness was formed with 15 degree angle in ultrasonic scaler tip and with 45 degree angle in hand curette of instrument tip and the specimen surface with 5 mm long, one horizontal-reciprocating motion per second for 30 seconds by 40 g force. To survey the surface roughness of each specimen, a field emission scanning electron microscope, an atomic force microscope, and a surface profiler were used. (Ra, §­).

RESULTS. According to SEM, most increased surface roughness was observed in SS group while IS groups had minimal roughness change. Measurement by atomic force microscope presented that the surface roughness of SS group was significantly greater than those of PS, IS and control groups in the type III gold alloy group (P<.05). IS group showed lesser surface roughness changes compared to SS group in porcelain and gold alloy group (P<.05). According to surface profiler, surface roughness of SS group showed greater than those of PS, IS and control groups and IS group showed lesser than those of SS group in all specimen groups. Type III gold alloy group had large changes on surface roughness than those of porcelain, titanium, zirconia (P<.05).

CONCLUSION. The result of this study showed that newly developed copper alloy scaler tip can cause minimal roughness impacts on the surface of implant and dental materials; therefore this may be a useful alternative for prophylaxis of implant and restored teeth.

Å°¿öµå

±¸¸® ÇÕ±Ý ½ºÄÉÀÏ·¯ ÆÁ; Ç¥¸é °ÅÄ¥±â; Á¦3Çü ±ÝÇÕ±Ý; µµÀç; ƼŸ´½; Áö¸£ÄڴϾÆ
Copper alloy scaler tip; Surface roughness; Gold alloys type III; Porcelain; Titanium; Zirconia

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed